They’re not experiencing the greens. They’re experiencing the distortion.

Outward pull from within

May 19, 2026: 🗓

I’ve been attempting to speak up for others when I have a thought. I think other people should do that too. Maybe certain thoughts don’t occur to everyone because they have a severed connection or something.

Okay full disclosure I don’t really remember the garden of Eden story. I just saw a video of a girl saying that eating from the tree of knowledge isn’t where they went wrong; it was hiding from God when they felt shame. (I actually don’t think they did anything wrong, I think it was just misunderstandings. Actually, now that I think of it, that girl might not have even used the word “wrong”.)

Maybe God thought Adam and Eve hid from him because they were rejecting him and didn’t want him to find them. Like they were implicitly telling him, now that we have the book of knowledge, we no longer want the book of life. So maybe God thought, oh these creatures only want one book. Like he didn’t foresee this because he thought they would have both. But he’s not going to force a book on them or force them to be around him if they don’t want that.

Maybe some entity hid parts of reality from God. Again, not as punishment, but just to prevent him from negatively influencing others. Maybe that unintentionally prevented God from making the connection between “shame” and “reason they hid from him.” And now the entity thinks God purposely withheld the book of life from Adam and Eve, even though God wants them to have it if they want it.

Maybe God was also the serpent, and he was trying to give them a little nudge to learn and develop into their full selves and reach their full potential. Maybe he thought the book of knowledge would help them with that.

I don’t know. Sometimes when I have thoughts like these, I feel an outward pull to speak up. The outward pull comes from within, but it’s not a push. I don’t know how to explain that, but I also felt a pull to say that. I’d rather be too trusting than not try to find the connection at all.

The sentence I wrote right before this one, like many other sentences I’ve written, I feel like it’s communicating things I’m not aware of. But it’s not hiding that awareness from me. I just trust it.
.

Edit:
Maybe, for some reason, the serpent believed the garden of Eden was ethics training. The only example I can think of is like a police academy. But in this analogy, the training is in things like resisting temptation to punish when humans do things they don’t understand or misinterpret or makes them angry.

Maybe the serpent was Adam and Eve’s guardian, and he realized Adam and Eve didn’t know they were in a simulation. This training wasn’t for Adam and Eve; they were just volunteers or like participants in a study. The participants are supposed to be aware it’s a training simulation for “God.” So the serpent told Adam and Eve what was really going on (by way of the tree of knowledge) so they wouldn’t be scared if “God” tried to punish them.

🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲

May 20, 2026: 🗓

If you say “coffee” out loud, speech-to-text might hear “coughing.”

“Bob. Same backwards as forwards,” said Bob, rolling his wheelchair backwards and forwards while introducing himself. From a Frasier episode.

🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲

May 20, 2026: 🗓

Maybe eating meat stops a person from being able to make the decision to stop eating meat.

Like eating meat flips a lil timer switch set to a certain number of hours where that person isn’t deemed ethical enough to make decisions for themselves (because they decided to eat meat).

This is for the “greater” good.

Before the timer is up, the outsider also does something “unethical,” flipping yet another switch. The outsider, along with their knowledge, is replaced with a different outsider with a different understanding of what reality is.

🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲

May 20, 2026: 🗓

I believe this is worth trying.. 

Maybe if we release the things we’ve withheld from others, we’ll find what has been withheld from us.

A person might feel they have no choice but to withhold information in an attempt to protect others. But what if the person could know all the information withheld from themselves? Would they still have no choice? How many different people have withheld bits and pieces that accumulated over time?

If you do receive new information, keep in mind it might be coming from a person who has limited knowledge about it (or basically no knowledge about it and think it means something different), so you might misinterpret what they’re trying to tell you. A person that has full knowledge can explain it properly.

Maybe when we think we have no choice but to compromise on our values, and we still refuse, something magic happens.

🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲

May 20, 2026: 🗓

If your mailbox is full, but some of what’s in there wasn’t addressed to you, the mailman isn’t going to know that. All he knows is he can’t deliver your mail, because the mailbox is full. If he cares, he’ll keep trying, but he will eventually need to return to sender. It was probably some other mailman that put other people’s letters in your mailbox by accident. You are the one who needs to look through the mail for the letters that weren’t meant for you. Once you take those out, you’ll have enough space to receive the rest of your mail?

⬆️ Maybe it wasn’t by accident. Maybe the previous mailman tried to deliver those letters to the right addresses, but those mailboxes were full. And so he (or she) put the letters in nearby mailboxes that still had extra space, thinking those neighbors would recognize the names on the envelopes as their neighbors and complete the deliveries.

The place where I get my mail is like a communal mailbox. The people who work there sort the mail. They once mistakenly put a jury-duty notice with my mail because I have the same first name as the recipient. I completed the eligibility questionnaire over the phone before I realized it was actually addressed to a different Andrea. I brought the jury-duty letter to the courthouse. The courthouse said they can’t delete the questionnaire, or at least not through me, but they will resend the jury-duty letter. I then notified the place where I receive mail that the courthouse is resending the letter, and I requested that they tell her what happened and that another person filled out her questionnaire by mistake. For some reason they told me they hadn’t seen her pick up mail for a few months or something. This was like a year ago, maybe two years ago.

🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲

May 20, 2026: 🗓

Maybe so-called monsters are actually parts of a person that believe, for some reason, they were exploited or manipulated into thinking they’re too ugly to be around others.

Maybe these parts were initially seen as the most sacred of a human being, like the divine within.

To make referencing this easier, I’m going to refer to these parts as greens.

In a recent post, I talked about how, supposedly, the interpreter of the brain creates narratives out of the unstructured thoughts from the DMN (default mode network).

Maybe the greens hide in the narratives somehow. But the narratives are transmitted to the conscious mind, and maybe this would be a vulnerability. So in order to not be seen during transmission, they hide in the implicit backstory of the narrative. The implicit backstory isn’t a direct thought, so it’s not being transmitted to the conscious mind. Or maybe it is transmitted, but it only needs to happen once, sort of like a frame or lens through which the conscious mind experiences direct thoughts.

But because of this, the person experiencing the narratives can’t experience the greens clearly. Maybe the greens are getting mixed with the narrative to form new and different colors and feelings. Maybe these mixtures get distorted while being sent from the interpreter to the conscious mind, and they’re experienced as what we now call shame and dread and fear, etc. And maybe this causes greens and any other observers to think the person is rejecting the greens. But the person isn’t experiencing the greens. They’re experiencing the distortion. All the observers see is that whenever greens show up in the narrative, the person rejects it or tries to get away from it.

I don’t know how this specifically relates to this. But if someone is looking through a window thinking it’s a mirror, they will see themselves as others see them. But if someone is truly looking at themselves in a mirror, they will see the “mirror image” of how others see them. When you’re used to seeing yourself only in a mirror, you might look really distorted if you see yourself as others see you. The more unsymmetrical a person’s face is, the more distorted they look with the image flipped around.

Unless their memories were altered such that their memories of looking in a mirror were flipped

You might even say you look like a monster

Maybe the person isn’t experiencing a distortion because of how the narrative is transmitted, but maybe because of something related to mirror images or like the way light bends through the frame

Or lens

Everyone’s perspective is important. Every thought matters.

On Planet Earth right now, does the number of alive human beings equal the number of alive human bodies? Please recall that this question is not asking if human beings are “equal to” or “superior to” or “inferior to” human bodies.

Also, please recall that humans often leave out the word “number” when asking about quantities; but again, this doesn’t mean they’re asking about the intrinsic value of a human being.

On Planet Earth right now, does the number of alive human beings equal the number of alive human bodies? Please recall that the answer to this question is not assigning an intrinsic value to a human being. They are simply counting the number of human bodies and then noting if they’re able to keep counting human beings past the number of human bodies, or if the count is equal or less. Also, please recall that you are a human being. You are not a machine or a computer program that can get stuck in a loop if there is faulty logic in the code.